<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NZ Herald: Air New Zealand&#8217;s mile-high pay gap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://riceagain.com/2008/03/nz-herald-air-new-zealands-mile-high-pay-gap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://riceagain.com/2008/03/nz-herald-air-new-zealands-mile-high-pay-gap/</link>
	<description>China, Suzhou, Food and Commentary</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: chriswaugh_bj</title>
		<link>http://riceagain.com/2008/03/nz-herald-air-new-zealands-mile-high-pay-gap/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>chriswaugh_bj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://riceagain.com/?p=66#comment-61</guid>
		<description>You're right that outsourcing labour is not in and of itself wrong, but as you see, in this case it's resulted in Chinese workers being grossly underpaid and unfairly treated simply because of the passport they hold. That is wrong. 

Secondly, Air NZ is opening itself up to huge PR problems in China- problems that will reflect on our whole country and all its people once the fenqing get wind of this- because it was too cheap? lazy? stupid? naive? to do things properly. 

Ah, well, I can see I'm preaching to the converted, so I'll stop ranting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right that outsourcing labour is not in and of itself wrong, but as you see, in this case it&#8217;s resulted in Chinese workers being grossly underpaid and unfairly treated simply because of the passport they hold. That is wrong. </p>
<p>Secondly, Air NZ is opening itself up to huge PR problems in China- problems that will reflect on our whole country and all its people once the fenqing get wind of this- because it was too cheap? lazy? stupid? naive? to do things properly. </p>
<p>Ah, well, I can see I&#8217;m preaching to the converted, so I&#8217;ll stop ranting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
